Jump to content

Talk:Clinical trials unit

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article was made in by the makers of www.clinicaltrialsunit.co.uk —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spchjok (talkcontribs) 14:33, 14 April 2010

Why do clinical trials units exist?

[edit]

This seems to be be the big question which isn't answered by this article at the moment! I can see two possible reasons:

  • Economic; it might not be economic for many small- to medium-sized drug companies to keep the skilled staff in-house
  • Scientific; a clinical trial supervized from outside the devolping company might get a more favourable hearing than one organized entirely in-house.

Do we have any clear evidence to support either of these hypotheses? Physchim62 (talk) 00:11, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Regulation around the world?

[edit]

I've found plenty of information on CTUs outside of the UK (see, for instance, [1]) but have not found any information on what regulatory bodies, if any, govern them. It would be great if this could be expanded with sourced content explaining who oversees CTUs elsewhere in the world. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:23, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Clinical trials unit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:55, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]