Talk:Clinical Practice Research Datalink

This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Health Service, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.National Health ServiceWikipedia:WikiProject National Health ServiceTemplate:WikiProject National Health ServiceNational Health Service

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Data quality issues

This the same data source for the study lead by AB Bindman which found it to be unusable for international comparisons because of data quality issues. More than 30% of all encounter records had no indication/problem recorded. Problem may be in record somewhere but not linked to the encounter. The study was able to use a random sample of encounter data from USA, Australia and New Zealand data sources with proper linkage between encounters and the problems managed. Information from a conference presentation by Dr Helena Britt. tygrus (talk) 08:22, 1 December 2009 (UTC)).[reply]

Anonymised?

This article talks about the data being anonymised. However, it also talks about linking to external disease registries on an individual patient level. Those two things seem inconsistent, as I can't see how it would be possible to link to external disease registries if the data were truly anonymised. It seems more likely that the data are pseudonymised (ie the identity of the patient is not accessible to someone given the standard data elements, but that somewhere the link between the records in the database and an identifiable individual still exist, presumably under much tighter security than the rest of the database). If the data were anonymised, then it would be impossible to link the data records to an identifiable individual.

However, I don't know what actually happens here. Maybe someone with intimate knowledge of how the database works could clarify?

AdamJacobs (talk) 08:17, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:40, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]