Talk:Clifton, Greater Manchester

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Greater Manchester Mid‑importance

	Greater Manchester portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

i live in clifton...yay.

I went through the article today putting in internal links but didn't always remember to fill in the box saying what I'd done - sorry!!! The article is very interesting but seems to have a lot of the same information as the one on the Wet Earth Colliery. Would it be sensible to amalgamate the two?Richerman 14:36, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it would be at all sensible to merge the two articles. Clifton is not just the Wet Earth Colliery, it is also Clifton House, Clifton Country Park, Clifton Aqueduct, Clifton Viaduct, Clifton railway station.....the list goes on. The article is too long and too complex to merge into Clifton. If anything, what needs to happen is the coal mining section of this page needs to be moved into a separate article. Parrot of Doom 17:19, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The info on the WEC has been copied across from what I originally wrtote for the main WEC article, this only serves to confuse the Clifton article, Fletcher, Brindley et al were not from Clifton so shouldn't be included other than in passing in an article on Clifton. If anything that info should be removed and WEC left as a paragraph similar to the other pits mentioned and pointing to the main WEC article. Geotek 11:24, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, on reflection I'd agree that would be the way forward. It just seems daft to me to have large chunks of text duplicated in two articles. Sorry, I cocked up the "talk" bit and got two discussions going Richerman 18:28, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Text copied from WEC

I have removed this text and generally tidied up the page. Parrot of Doom 22:43, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

General tidy up

I've added a bit about Clifton railway station and Clifton Aqueduct with internal links, so the article should now point to the other Clifton articles which I hadn't realised were there. If there are any others I've missed could someone add them in? I've also put in a load of other internal links. I think the article now works much better as a link page for other articles on Clifton. Thanks to the Parrot for sorting out the Wet Earth section. Richerman 11:36, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stub

This article seems fairly detailed. Does it need to remain a stub? Parrot of Doom 14:51, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Greater Manchester County Council Arms.png

Image:Greater Manchester County Council Arms.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:46, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Greater Manchester County Council Arms.png

Image:Greater Manchester County Council Arms.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:24, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Clifton, Greater Manchester. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081203215108/http://www.dmm2.org.uk/uknames/u1885-04.htm to http://www.dmm2.org.uk/uknames/u1885-04.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:51, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]