Talk:Clayton and Bell
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
"their use of the best quality glass available"
[edit]The headline is a quote from this article's lead. I notice this article is categorized as one of the Defunct glassmaking companies. Wouldn't those companies have made glass? I'd have thought (I agree I do not know) that Clayton and Bell would have bought in glass to suit their work. Am I wrong? Eddaido (talk) 07:50, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
The stained glass depicted in the two illustrations of a window at Darlinghurst, Sydney, is not by Clayton & Bell. Martin Harrison — Preceding unsigned comment added by Martin Harrison (talk • contribs) 11:34, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Clayton and Bell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070715010703/http://www.westminstercathedral.org.uk/art/art_mosaics_2.html to http://www.westminstercathedral.org.uk/art/art_mosaics_2.html
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.stainedglassrecords.org/home
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:57, 9 August 2017 (UTC)