Talk:Class A Wild Trout Waters/GA1
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: MPJ-DK (talk · contribs) 04:47, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
I will be picking up the review of this one - both for the Wiki Cup and the GA cup as well. I will be making my review comments over the next couple of days.
Side note, I would love some input on a Featured List candidate, Mexican National Light Heavyweight Championship. I am not asking for Quid pro Quo, but all help is appreciated. MPJ-US 04:47, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
I will be picking up the review of this one - both for the Wiki Cup and the GA cup as well. I will be making my review comments over the next couple of days.
Side note, I would love some input on a Featured List candidate, Mexican National Light Heavyweight Championship. I am not asking for Quid pro Quo, but all help is appreciated. MPJ-US 05:18, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
GA Toolbox
[edit]I like to get this checked out first, I have found issues using this that has led to quick fails so it's important this passes muster.
- Peer review tool
- WP:LEAD - guidelines suggests 1-2 paragraphs for the lead. This has 3, I would move paragraph up to the first paragraph and combine them.
- Done.
- I would put one of the four pictures at the top of the article and scatter the other three through out instead of having a gallery at the bottom.
- Personally, I think they do better in their own section, since they're not really about any specific aspect of Class A Wild Trout Waters, just general pictures showing what they can look like. I did learn several months ago that galleries aren't inherently forbidden,or even discouraged. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 15:37, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
- One thing that would help is a picture by the lead, just something visual to pull people in. How about a trout picture? MPJ-US 15:52, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
- @MPJ-DK: Found one! --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 17:40, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
- Copyright violations Tool
- It is only indicating some overlapping titles that really cannot be reworded such as "Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission"
- Disambiguation links
- No issues
- External links
- No issues
Well Written
[edit]- "The first streams were designated as Class A Wild Trout Waters in 1983." should be reworded - how about something like "The first streams received their Class A Wild Trout Waters designations in 1983."
- Done.
- "At this time" should be "At the time"
- Changed to "At that time".
- "heavily-fished" should be "heavily fished"
- Done.
- "has, due to "'social' concerns", become hesitant to classify streams as Class A Wild Trout Waters." should be reordered "has become hesitant to classify streams as Class A Wild Trout Waters due to "'social' concerns""
- Done.
- "trout, since" does not need a comma
- Done.
- "for propagation" should be "for the propagation"
- Done.
- "stocked with trout, prior" does not need a comma
- Done.
- "and 62 Class A Wild Trout Waters" i feel like it is missing something?
- Fixed.
Sources/verifiable
[edit]- Reference 8 needs more info on the book
- What more information is needed? There's already the agency that created it, the URL, the title, the date, and the page number. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 15:37, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
- Looking at the Google book link I cannot see any other data that can be added. MPJ-US 02:08, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
Broad in coverage
[edit]- It covers all aspects of the topic I believe.
Neutral
[edit]- yes
Stable
[edit]- No issues
Illustrated / Images
[edit]- All appropriatly licensed.
- @Jakec: - review complete. It is a fairly short article, but is just over the size of what i would expect as a minimum. Putting the review on hold for 7 days to allow for updates to be made. MPJ-US 05:18, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
- @MPJ-DK: Thanks for picking up the review. I'm aware it is solidly on the short side, but I did feel it covered all the details one would expect to find. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 15:37, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Jakec: - you are welcome, I agree it covers the main areas so while it's short it's not too short. MPJ-US 15:52, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Jakec: - Looking at it now, I believe it's a GA - short and sweet I guess. Congratulations. MPJ-US 02:09, 3 April 2016 (UTC)