Jump to content

Talk:Clarendon Shopping Centre

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GAN

[edit]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Clarendon Shopping Centre/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TenPoundHammer (talk · contribs) 22:12, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

I'm interested in shopping malls but have seldom had the time to explore content on ones in other countries. This article was a fascinating look into how they differ in the UK. I think you've hit on all the major points and given a clear encyclopedic picture on the mall and its notability.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Again, good work. I made a couple tweaks, such as a removal of the word "recent" and the addition of the owner and developer to the infobox. There was very little to modify here, hence the short review. Good work.

DYK nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 00:48, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The old Clarendon Hotel
The old Clarendon Hotel
  • Reviewed: This is my first nomination, so I think I'm exempt? Would rather see at least one review through before trying my own.

Improved to Good Article status by YorkshireLad (talk). Self-nominated at 08:47, 17 October 2019 (UTC).[reply]