Talk:City to Sea Bridge

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bridges and Tunnels Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notability

The bridge is probably notable because it is rather distinctive and is more or less a work of art, but because a typical pedestrian overbridge is definitely not notable, we need good sources (something like a magazine article or newspaper feature from when it was built). dramatic (talk) 00:04, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. There are scant references to the bridge online. Lanma726 (talk) 01:28, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mountain fountain?

@Prosperosity: I think you may need to edit your latest addition - was Robin Woodward talking about Mountain Fountain or the bridge? Doesn't make sense as it is. Wainuiomartian (talk) 02:16, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wainuiomartian: Thanks! I've fixed up my typo. --Prosperosity (talk) 02:18, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Demolishing Debates?

News reads say it's getting demolished do we edit out the present tense and change it to past tense? Johnnysinsismydad (talk) 15:07, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not yet. WCC wants to demolish it but that's it so far. We should put this on the page though. Wainuiomartian (talk) 17:40, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Text about design flaws reinstated

I have reinstated some text about design flaws - danger of small children falling through gaps, drainage and rot issues etc and have added sources, as a previous edit appears to have removed this content as 'misinformation'. I've put this all under 'History' as they are past issues relating to construction rather than engineering.