Talk:Citroën C1

Automobiles Mid‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

It would be nice with some links to owners-/user- reviews of this car, preferably with lots of pics.

Proposal: Merging articles on Peugeot 107, Citroën C1 and Toyota Aygo?

See this proposal.

HHahn (Talk) 15:28, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

99g per km CO2 model

The new 2012 model (with the LED daylight running lights) and equipped with the 1.0 petrol engine, theoretically emits just 99 grammes of carbon dioxide per kilometre driven, putting it in the UK tax band A meaning no road tax is payable on it at all in the UK, even after the first year! --86.157.83.117 (talk) 20:06, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why is CO2 being deleted??

I see no apparent reason for this, so I am contesting it. Thanks, George (My Talk Page) 22:13, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It was just a temporary deletion while some of the variations were renamed (eg {{co2}}). It's back now, so I have restored its use in this article. Stepho talk 23:41, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Was the 1KR-FE ever in the second gen and is the C1 "enterprise" real?

I've tried googling and looking through dealer brochures but I can't find any evidence that the second gen had the 1KR-FE or if the first gen Enterprise ever existed. RealNZZN (talk) 16:17, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rear image removal

Why was the rear image from the first and second generation removed but the rear images of the facelifts kept? Most other automotive pages have a front and rear image. RealNZZN (talk) 20:31, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@RealNZZN: Only 1 rear image was removed and that was because an image illustrating the same part of the car appears 3 sections later in the article, and there is no particular need to have the rear of the car shown twice. It just creates more text wrapping for no reason. I also readded the horizontal table and fixed any issue of overflow since the vertical table creates a lot of whitespace for no reason. And I readded the NCAP results you removed since this is relevant information that should be in the article. Terasail ^[✉] 22:07, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@RealNZZN: @Terasail: I readded the pre-facelift rear image with gallery to avoid text wrapping, and restored vertical sales table to conform with countless other car articles and for easy mobile reading. White space usually wasn't really a problem as long it's tidy enough. Andra Febrian (talk) 07:43, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]