Talk:Circuit judge (England and Wales)

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved to Circuit judge (England and Wales). Jenks24 (talk) 15:58, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Circuit judge (UK) → Circuit Judge –

Since the UK seems to be the only jurisdiction that officially terms judges Circuit Judges, I thinkCircuit Judges should link to here, with a further link to a Circuit Judge (disambiguation) page at the top. The existing Circuit Judges should be renamed as a disambiguation page. Doing it the other way around, as it presently is, is US-centric.Gymnophoria (talk) 16:14, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. (1) Per WP:CAPS, Do not capitalize the second or subsequent words in an article title, unless the title is a proper noun. Circuit Judge John Doe is Doe's formal title, capitalized, but a generic circuit judge isn't capitalized. (2) A circuit judge is a judge in a circuit court, and should similarly cover the topic from a worldwide viewpoint. UK is not the only jurisdiction, see Circuit Court (Ireland), United States circuit court, Alabama Circuit Courts, Florida Circuit Courts, Hawaii State Circuit Courts, Illinois Circuit Courts, Kentucky Circuit Courts... Wbm1058 (talk) 20:59, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose US has Circuit Judges -- 76.65.131.160 (talk) 05:17, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment there is another open requested move at Talk:Circuit judge -- 76.65.131.160 (talk) 05:19, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose UK is hardly the only one, I think the US term is actually more known. TJ Spyke 11:53, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for same reasons given on Talk:Circuit judge. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 19:42, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Circuit judge (England and Wales), since the rest of the UK doesn't have them. -- Necrothesp (talk) 21:23, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Agree or Move to Circuit judge (England and Wales). As the preceding comment says, this is not a UK wide title. Scotland (for instance) does not have them. The "UK" qualification is just plain wrong. It is said by others in this discussion that the term is used by other jurisdictions. If that is correct, the fact should be noted, eg in the articles Circuit Court (Ireland), United States circuit court. At the moment there is no evidence in those articles that the judges are called "circuit judges" and some evidence they are called other things. If no other jurisdiction uses the term, then the entry should of course be reserved for the England and Wales variety, otherwise not. It is of course nonsense to say that "A circuit judge is a judge in a circuit court". There is no such thing as a circuit court in England where we invented the term "circuit" in its judicial context. Circuit judges sit in a variety of courts, in particular county courts and the Crown Court but also in other places. Francis Davey (talk) 13:48, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment opening the same discussion in multiple locations confuses the process. --Education does not equal common sense. 我不在乎 00:02, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Objection, your Honor, the question assumes facts not in evidence! The Republic of Ireland also has a section in Circuit court. Comment was incorrectly placed on WP:RM by 86.40.100.251 -- Interplanet Janet, Esquire IANAL 17:17, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So it does, but do they call their judges "circuit judges"? I don't know. Neither does wikipedia. Something that should be resolved either way. Francis Davey (talk) 20:01, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

United States circuit court is a historical article about a court that was abolished in 1911. Text in this article: "...and later a circuit judge, would sit on the circuit court."; "...circuit riding was somewhat alleviated by the appointment of circuit judges under the Circuit Judges Act of 1869."; "Although any district court judge could be authorized to act as a circuit judge..."—the term is a general and broad term, and any Wikipedia article on circuit judge should cover the topic from a broad, worldwide, current and historical perspective. Wbm1058 (talk) 14:17, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent. I missed that. Then "circuit judge" is a generic terms and this page should simply be moved to Circuit judge (England and Wales). It really makes no sense being here. By the way this is not at all obvious (as it might seem to you). Over here: district judge doesn't sit in a district court (there's no such thing) and a circuit judge doesn't sit in a circuit court, puisne judges (when we had them) didn't sit in a puisne court. It just isn't logical in the way you might expect, but that's because we don't have a neat judge/court mapping that some jurisdictions do. Francis Davey (talk) 20:03, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, Circuit Judge is a generic term and there is no evidence of a primary topic. older ≠ wiser 12:10, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose but move to Circuit judge (England and Wales) as the E&W usage is not primary and this title isn't found in Scotland or Northern Ireland. Bencherlite ^Talk 15:59, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Circuit judge (England and Wales). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090221000105/http://www.england-legislation.hmso.gov.uk/acts/acts2007/en/07en15-d.htm to http://www.england-legislation.hmso.gov.uk/acts/acts2007/en/07en15-d.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:49, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]