Talk:Circles of Sustainability

Environment: Sustainability Mid‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Sustainability task force.

Urban studies and planning

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Removal of Criticisms

NOTICE for removal of this section There is evidence that this index is being used and further developed.

YES remove it. contribs) 11:33, 27 January 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mkevlar[reply]

If nobody provides input on this discussion by Febuary 1 2015 I will be removing the Criticism section. comment added by Mkevlar

Undoing the change by an unsigned account without offering proof of the index is still in use is not acceptable. I am reinstating the previous edit TheKevlar (talk) 03:20, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copying and close paraphrasing

It appears that much of this article has been copied or closely paraphrased from http://citiespro.pmhclients.com/images/uploads/Indicators_-_Briefing_Paper.pdf or a similar UN document. Short quotes are okay but we need to credit them to the source. I suggest the whole article be reviewed and compared to all other cited sources to ensure we're not violating copyrights and we're properly paraphrasing, not copying them. Joja lozzo 14:03, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This seems to have been rectified. PP 13 November 2012 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.237.41.254 (talk) 06:26, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have reviewed the article and it now reads well. However, it needs more more material on the kinds of use to which the method has been applied and the outcomes. 113.28.20.236 (talk) 11:19, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem about the paraphrasing. I think that it now needs more on how the actual method works. 120.144.45.185 (talk) 04:54, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]