Talk:CinemaNow

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

California: Los Angeles Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: Filmmaking

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Filmmaking task force.

Date change

I changed the announcement date of the collaboration between Blockbuster and CinemaNow from January 2008 to January 2009, based on seeing the press release posted this week by a friend who works for CinemaNow's owner, Sonic Solutions. I'm pretty sure 2008 was the kind of date typo common in the January of any year -- if I'm incorrect about this, I apologize. Mnoe817 (talk) 08:28, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ownership

I think it is now owned by BestBuy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.139.18.163 (talk) 21:47, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

COI editor

An attorney for the company has twice now made edits that make the article read like a press release. His version was not written in encyclopedic WP:TONE nor in a format that follow WP:LEAD or the MOS in general. I would ask that COI editor not to edit-war but to examine other companies' Wikipedia article and try to emulate the style and tone. For example, two business-related articles that reached official "Good Article" status are Nestlé Purina PetCare and Dean Witter Reynolds. --Tenebrae (talk) 20:00, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have further removed advertorial from this article, as well as the deprecated listing of "competitors". However, I have re-added the logo and the fact that the company has been sold to FilmOn referenced to a reliable, independent source. In light of that I have also removed the maintenance tags for "advertising tone" and lack of inline citations—the article has multiple inline citations. An editor who has the article's subject as his client should not be editing this article at all. He should request edits on this talk page for uninvolved editors to evaluate and and implement if they are justified. He should also explicitly state the names of the companies he represents on his talk page. Voceditenore (talk) 07:34, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Voceditenore: Hear ye, hear ye! Everything you say is absolutely correct, and may I compliment you on an excellent job of bringing this sorry article up to encyclopedic standards. I went through and filled out the references — many contained no bylines or names of publications/websites — and added archive links. A pleasure to meet you and work with you! --Tenebrae (talk) 15:14, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

CinemaNow Pic.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:53, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]