Talk:Chypre

salut tout le monde ca va bien?

Eh, comme ci comme ca... 2A00:1370:8143:C177:1156:13D5:9E2:E28 (talk) 17:52, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Terminology

I think maybe 'accord' needs to be defined for the general reader. Also the word 'fond' does not mean anything to me in this context. Otherwise this seems fine and well written. TuttiFruttiCherryPie (talk) 13:02, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chypre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070810105829/http://www.museesdegrasse.com/MIP/fla_ang/histo_gXIX.shtml to http://www.museesdegrasse.com/mip/fla_ang/histo_gXIX.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:36, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I added a Fragrantica link to Shipr from Brocard

To make things clear: apparently, six-component Shipr made by Brocard and Co. in Moscow is either precessing or unrelated to the Coty's 16-component perfume from 1917; added Fragrantica links because this fragnance-cyclopedia site has "scent pyramides" of both. UPDATED Uchyotka (talk) 09:12, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fun fact: even in 1840, Guerlain had own "Eau de Chypre" inspired by even earlier oakmoss experiments 22:24, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
- It's also interesting how some kinds of XVI century "oakmoss powder" are mentioned in link-related book.

Uchyotka (talk) 15:03, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

While I feel neutral on "Chypre de Coty" being so popular it is considered to be "influential"; it is incorrect to claim pre-revolution Shipr is "descendant" of Chypre de Coty or even a copy.

Said claim is some kind of urban myth in Russia, on par with Krasnaya Moskva being a copy of Chanel #5.
- Yet while KM-related legend was debunked by finding very similar 1905 perfume (e.g. the myth supporters were sated with "copy, but not Chanel 5" answer) (and so were people who were able to compare Chanel 5 and KM), the masculne Shipr was claimed to be "initially designed to be feminine", which is weird, since there were unisex perfumes in USSR like Ogni Moskvy (a chypre one, by the way) Uchyotka (talk) 10:43, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]