This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
Church of the Gesú (Philadelphia) is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philadelphia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Philadelphia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhiladelphiaWikipedia:WikiProject PhiladelphiaTemplate:WikiProject PhiladelphiaPhiladelphia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
A fact from Church of the Gesú (Philadelphia) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 21 October 2019 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
I don't know how the DYK got out of the gate with that form, but the reference in question says that it held over 200 relic authenticity certificates in the archives. The other reference says 391 relics by 1891, and its "largest ever" is a self-peacock-claim that we should probably not take seriously without third-party evidence. Elizium23 (talk) 23:24, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Elizium23: If you take a look at the DYK discussion, you will see that there was concern over the reliability of the 370 source as a standalone reference. Hence, the more conservative but solidly verifiable number of 200 was settled on. Ergo Sum23:37, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
