Jump to content

Talk:Church of St Demetrius, Patalenitsa/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 23:16, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: One found and fixed.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 23:18, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:19, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

[edit]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    The lead could do with a little expansion to more fully summarize the article, see WP:LEAD Done
    I made one minor copy-edit.[2]. Otherwise the prose is fine
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Article is sufficiently referenced. I assume good faith for the Bulgatian sources.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Enough detail to cover major points
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Images licensed and captioned.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    On hold for seven days for the lead issue to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:27, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Just what was needed, I am now happy to pass this a GA. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:01, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi and thanks for the review! I have expanded the intro per your suggestion. Toдor Boжinov 09:39, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]