Jump to content

Talk:Chuck Versus the Last Details/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: That Ole Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 18:14, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There are only a few minor problems, after fixed, article should make GA no problem.

  • 4.099 million viewers, can we round this to 4.1 please, it helps reading (only for the lead, below readers want focus on accuracy).
    •  Done
  • The link to "best man" in the plot, is overkill, should be removed.
    •  Done
  • Can you rephrase the first sentence of the Production section since those exact words have already been used in the lead.
    •  Done
  • Could you subsection the Music and Cultural references under Production, it would look cleaner like that.
    •  Done
  • Again, first sentence of Reception is exactly the same as the lead, it's repetitious and needs to be changed.
    •  Done
  • Is there no less positive review to be found? It seems slightly biased, if there isn't don't sweat it, but if there is one to be found it should be added.
    • I've added the only somewhat negative review I can find from a semi-reliable source, where the reviewer says that the show's "anything that can go wrong will go wrong" pace is "killing [her, the reviewer,] by inches".
  • The References list should be split in 2.
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Just needs a few changes here and there, everything is fine in this area.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): (citations to reliable sources): (OR):
    Perfic'
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    Needs a review that focuses more on the negative aspects of the episode, if none are to be found, this will be changed to a pass.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    Perfic'.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Comments above.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Fantastic stuff! That Ole Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 21:30, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! --Boycool (talk) 21:50, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]