Talk:Chuck Versus Agent X/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Ruby2010 comment! 01:35, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Comments
[edit]- The talkpage needs Wikiprojects
- Done.
- The plot section is largely confusing to me (a non-Chuck watcher). Not sure if this can be fixed enough for non-viewers to comprehend, but I recommend giving it a slight rewrite
- The episode itself was largely confusing, even for a hardcore viewer like me, but the summary is not quite chronological, especially in the first few paragraphs. It's only 372 or so words, so I'll work on it later.
- I edited the plot and I think it's just about as detailed as it can get to be clear to non-Chuck viewers without going over on detail (or word count).
- The episode itself was largely confusing, even for a hardcore viewer like me, but the summary is not quite chronological, especially in the first few paragraphs. It's only 372 or so words, so I'll work on it later.
- In the lead you say a character "makes a life-changing discovery" from a laptop, but the plot is unclear on this (it just says "spy will")
- I tweaked the plot summary in the lead, because it wasn't true to the episode's actual plot.
- Indicate Jeffster! is a band
- Done
- Too many "also"s and "revealed"s in production
- I removed an "also" and changed a few "revealed"s. Tell me if there are still too many.
- I recommend combining music and cultural ref sections (combine under "Music and cultural references" heading)
- Done.
- Websites are not italicize (i.e. TV by the Numbers (add wikilink also)). Also, Den of Geek is three words.
- Done.
- Sentences ending in quotes need a citation directly after period (mostly in reception section)
- Done.
- Ref 9 needs accessdate
- Done; I was missing a bit of code in the ref.
- Either italicize all Chucks and other TV shows in ref titles, or none of them
- The only "Chuck"s italicized are the ones that were italicized in the titles of the original websites.
- I recommend still italicizing all of them for consistency's sake (see Lost episodes for examples, if needed) Ruby2010 comment! 15:07, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
- Done. --Boycool (talk) 20:54, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
I'll place the review on hold for seven days while everything gets sorted. Please reply here when your edits are finished, as I will not be watching the article page. Thanks and good luck, Ruby2010 comment! 02:30, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
- Looks great! Pass for GA. Nice work, Ruby2010 comment! 03:13, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks you very much! --Boycool (talk) 14:07, 14 June 2011 (UTC)