Jump to content

Talk:Chronographer

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by MeegsC (talk07:41, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Temple of Time (1846)
Temple of Time (1846)

Moved to mainspace by Dumelow (talk). Self-nominated at 14:06, 11 March 2021 (UTC).[reply]

  • GTG. Great stuff! New (just moved from sandbox), long & neutral enough. Well-written, qpq done. Hook checks out, although (perhaps being pedantic) I prefer to keep "depicted" for pictures - maybe "represented" or "tried to represent" as a tad more accurate. Earwig just finds quotes & titles, pic ok for main page. Johnbod (talk) 18:47, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review Johnbod, just to note I am happy for an alternative wording to be used - Dumelow (talk) 09:50, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, changed to "represented". Still GTG. Johnbod (talk) 16:42, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]