Talk:Christopher and Philip Booth

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers / Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Composers

This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Composers, a group of editors writing and developing biographical articles about composers of all eras and styles. The project discussion page is the place to talk about technical and editorial issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!ComposersWikipedia:WikiProject ComposersTemplate:WikiProject ComposersComposers

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Christopher and Philip Booth is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

CSB’s notable work (in the table)

Why is Angels of Passion listed instead of or at least without the specific mention of Ulterior Motives? Haydenmyoung (talk) 17:27, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The table only shows his film credits, not his specific musical work. -Samoht27 (talk) 17:30, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why? That doesn't seem to be accurate Haydenmyoung (talk) 00:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Birth date

The birth date is off by a year. FreeBMD suggests a birth quarter of Jan-Feb-Mar 1960 for the twins, born in Halifax. 92.40.217.156 (talk) 13:09, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

I propose merging Christopher Saint Booth with his brother Philip Adrian Booth to create Christopher and Philip Booth. The brothers worked most of their stuff together, including being a part of the band Sweeney Todd (Chris = Vocalist; Philip = Guitarist), composing the song Ulterior Motives, and of course directing the same movies together, such as The Possessed. Yoshiman6464 ^♫🥚 17:33, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I sort of agree with this, however Christopher and Philip as individual articles still makes sense, as they're members in a duo. Maybe Christopher and Philip Booth as its own separate article without merging the two would make more sense. Legreatcharl (talk) 00:46, 24 May 2024 (UTC) — Legreatcharl (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

I think, all told, it's a Trey Parker and Matt Stone thing where they are really famous for one thing, the both of them, but both cases are interesting. Phillip and Christopher are cult figures on the internet, so I vote keeping them seperate if (christopher only) or (philip only) is too prevalent. draft that duo article for now, and we all can make a better-informed decision from there. BarntToust (talk) 21:54, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think a duo-article is a good idea, but they're both seperate enough individuals that they warrant seperate articles. Like Legreatcharl said, this could be a third article for the both of them. XanderK09 (talk) 03:21, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think I can agree on a separate article as a due and leaving the Christopher and Philip ones as separate, although I would say that having the title be "Who's Who" would be better IMO since its what they're currently going as (as well as what they went as in the 80s). I think Who's Who (band) could be good, although it currently redirects to Daniel Vangarde. I think a disambiguation page that links to both would be good if this is created. reppop^talk 01:27, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you say Who's Who (band)? Kierandude (talk) 14:16, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i oppose

they’re still different people Kierandude (talk) 14:11, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support I was about to suggest this right now too, supporting due to the subjects being notable for the same thing. - Sebbog13 (talk) 04:56, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support. They both have very similar descriptions in their works, much more akin to the Chuckle Brothers, so they should be merged. Grandtubetrains (talk) 20:39, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that these articles should be merged, not convinced they have done much notable independent of each other. Laurenschneider210 (talk) 03:28, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, why have these not been merged yet?? Why is this discussion taking so long? - Sebbog13 (talk) 09:09, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Due to popular demand, I'll merge the articles. Yoshiman6464 ^♫🥚 05:16, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]