This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Christopher Bouzy article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
I included the "anti-Amber Heard YouTuber" descriptor for Nathaniel Broughty as the two sources cited mention that or use similar wording, e.g. The Information describes him as an "anti-Heard YouTuber" and the Wired source calls him a "pro-Depp partisan". Isi96 (talk) 22:18, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: Can you explain the descriptor's relevance to Christopher_Bouzy?
@Horizons 1 The content in this article was originally in the Bot Sentinel article, and it was moved over when it had grown sufficiently long. The descriptor was brought up on that article's talk page, and it was agreed that it should be included as the best descriptor as it is sourced (check that article's talk page for details). Isi96 (talk) 20:05, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Isi96,
For reference, this is the talk page you're referring to? Can you point to a single user in that thread that agrees with your position? Because I see two people against, and another 3 in this article's history. Horizons 1 (talk) 03:37, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The information is not a reliable or readable source and the consensus is that this is more inflammatory than anything else. Wikipedia is not a place for your opinions or for defamatory language, rather it's a place for objective facts. GreenerGrass1 (talk) 20:04, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wrong yet again. The wired article you claim mentions the YouTube but doesn't call him anti-heard. You can't make that assumption based on that article and no one who bothered to read it could either.
The simple fact is you are the only person who thinks that an unfounded personal attack deserves a place on this page.
It's very obvious from the talk page, that the consensus is against it and for some reason you seem to err on the side of misinformation instead of accurate description. GreenerGrass1 (talk) 11:34, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Implying Broughty is "anti-Amber Herd" is needlessly inflammatory and not accurate. While it is true that after hearing the facts of the case and applying his legal analysis, Broughty felt Johnny Depps lawsuit had more merit and he would likely win (which was ultimately the outcome), his position could be equally be characterized as pro-justice. Neither characterization is pertinent to the discussion of the lawsuit and should be left out. 98.144.193.63 (talk) 01:58, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the 