Talk:Christian anarchism/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: The Resident Anthropologist (talk)•(contribs) 01:51, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Initial Review

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   I am spotting run-on sentences all over the place

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   Lead fails to comply with WP:LEAD, Lots of violations of WP:W2W, Multiple WP:EMBED lists that could be better incorporated with prose

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   Lots of places need third party sources, I have tagged them

   C. No original research:

   Lots of what appears to be original research third party sourcing could clear up alot of this

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   Overall coverage is erratic and jumps back and forth

   B. Focused:

   History section fails to cover the history of the ideology. Simply listing supporting elements of CA in history is insufficient

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   article hinges on Alexandre Christoyannopoulos, could be expanded to include other writers on the issue

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

   You seem to be the only working on it and no serious

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   Looks good

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   At this initial review of material I say it needs alot of work. IF you have questions post below and we can see about fixing the issues before a final review.