This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egyptological subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient EgyptTemplate:WikiProject Ancient EgyptAncient Egypt articles
We should have an article on every pyramid and every nome in Ancient Egypt. I'm sure the rest of us can think of other articles we should have.
Cleanup.
To start with, most of the general history articles badly need attention. And I'm told that at least some of the dynasty articles need work. Any other candidates?
Standardize the Chronology.
A boring task, but the benefit of doing it is that you can set the dates !(e.g., why say Khufu lived 2589-2566? As long as you keep the length of his reign correct, or cite a respected source, you can date it 2590-2567 or 2585-2563)
Stub sorting
Anyone? I consider this probably the most unimportant of tasks on Wikipedia, but if you believe it needs to be done . . .
Data sorting.
This is a project I'd like to take on some day, & could be applied to more of Wikipedia than just Ancient Egypt. Take one of the standard authorities of history or culture -- Herotodus, the Elder Pliny, the writings of Breasted or Kenneth Kitchen, & see if you can't smoothly merge quotations or information into relevant articles. Probably a good exercise for someone who owns one of those impressive texts, yet can't get access to a research library.
NPOV: Maybe we should rewrite this statement "Jacq's series offers a simplified vision of the life of the pharaoh" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.115.19.103 (talk • contribs) 2006-01-23T15:27:15
When I've developed the fr.wikipedia article on this topic, I've found sources doesn't note simplification, but a lack of objectivity, and a tendancy to adopt as POV the pharaons' propaganda. --Dereckson (talk) 20:06, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It's an idealised POV but is a work of fiction extolling virtues of its characters. The character depicted is no longer living so his 'propaganda' would come down to inscriptions and so on. One can hardly criticise an author of fiction for not going into detail about things he didn't wish to include in the storyline: would it really be 'objective' to denigrate an author and pull the novels into a controversial debate over current feelings towards the real Ramses? No other sources do this. (Compare, for instance, the online article in Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Christian-Jacq). Attacking Jacq's take on Ramses would necessitate finding a balance of literary criticism which barely exists, and then perhaps similarly forcing personal views onto Tyldesley's novels as well. Hardly Wikipedia's place one might think. I suggest leave it as it is. Parzivalamfortas 22:38, 1 November 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Parzivalamfortas (talk • contribs)
There some issues on the Britannica biography:
they use 'earning a doctorate', but a phD isn't something you earn, it's something to prove you're able to do scientific research
'recognition from the French Academy' is a lie, one of the Jacq's novel won (with 30 others this year) one of the numerous prize ADMINISTRATED by the French Academy
before Champollion l’Egyptien, other historical novels published as Chritian Jacq treated other subjects so 'determined to share the enthusiasm and awe he felt for Egypt with as wide an audience as possible' is puzzling, especially when the author explains in several interviews not intending that first, but found himself to be very happy to be able to finally associate the two passions of his life, writing and Egypt.
citation needed for 'Jacq was given much of the credit for a significant increase in the number of French tourists traveling to Egypt in the late 1990s' — Antic Egypt become a trend in France (but was in the past too, it's something cyclical), it's not clear the impact of Jacq on this trend
_01.svg){kind=small}
