Talk:Christchurch City Holdings

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Christchurch City Holdings be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was not moved as we prioritize common names, give little weight to official names and normally avoid including legal status suffixes in article titles.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:23, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Christchurch City Holdings → Christchurch City Holdings Ltd – The abbreviation by which this holdings company is known as is CCHL, and I suggest that the 'L' for 'Ltd' should logically be included in the article name. Schwede 66 18:58, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Most unlikely that the Ltd is part of the common name, and the argument seems to appeal to the official name, which is in this case irrelevant. Andrewa (talk) 06:58, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Christchurch City Holdings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100208172206/http://www.cchl.co.nz/ to http://www.cchl.co.nz/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100516133955/http://www.spbl.co.nz:80/About+Us/Ownership.html to http://www.spbl.co.nz/About+Us/Ownership.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100208172206/http://www.cchl.co.nz/ to http://www.cchl.co.nz/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090221163325/http://www.cchl.co.nz:80/ to http://www.cchl.co.nz

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:08, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]