Talk:Chris Rice

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Christian music High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christian music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christian music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Christian musicWikipedia:WikiProject Christian musicTemplate:WikiProject Christian musicChristian music articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I'm as big a Chris Rice fan as anyone, but this article seems be badly in need of reworking for more nPOV and sources, and less reliance on quotes that seem to come from a PR release. (As usual when I make these statements rather than just editing, I don't feel up to the task, but am hoping to entice someone with more time and WP experience to take the initiative.) Lawikitejana 06:42, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Chrisrice-12.jpg

Image:Chrisrice-12.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:14, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edits

I added some more external links and awards to give more credibility to the article. Hopefully, this is accurate. Also, since this article was 'tagged' for use of the word "trivia" as a header I changed it somewhat and removed tag. If someone else has a better name - go for it. Hope this helps. Auteurdevie 19:38, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Chrisrice-12.jpg

Image:Chrisrice-12.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:28, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Deep enough to dream.jpg

Image:Deep enough to dream.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:30, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chris Rice. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:13, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Citations

I haven't done a lot of edits on Wikipedia before and am a bit unclear on the citation rules. Can someone explain or point me to an explanation of what constitutes a secondary source when all you're trying to do is demonstrate that the person has published a book, sold some artwork, or released an album (see the "Other" section that I recently added to this page). I get that it's not appropriate to cite a commerce site (e.g., Amazon), so what else is suitable documentation unless there is an independent review of the work? Or is that the whole point: if it hasn't been reviewed, it's not notable enough to mention? For the book, is a page on GoodReads.com acceptable?

Thanks for your help! Joecandeux (talk) 01:14, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia:Citing sources page should explain the basics. WP:PRIMARY vs WP:SECONDARY will explain the difference, but Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources should be kept in-mind as well. GoodReads is a user-run site (see Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 249#goodreads.com), so no. To prove that the work existed, it should be enough though, but a secondary, reliable source would be a better choice. Something like a mention from Christianity Today or CCM Magazine. {{primary source inline}} are not tags of shame, they're intended to inform the reader that the sources are not as good as they could be and they're designed to help editors try to improve the reference, which is looks like is your goal. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:37, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Date of birth is needed.--109.252.95.217 (talk) 07:36, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image

Is that picture even the right Chris Rice? Not such a good Wikipedia page 2600:1700:579C:4010:E4E1:13D7:6CD2:56DF (talk) 01:56, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]