Talk:Chorlton tram stop

	Greater Manchester portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK Trams (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject UK Trams, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.UK TramsWikipedia:WikiProject UK TramsTemplate:WikiProject UK TramsUK Trams articles

Trains: Stations / in UK / Streetcars Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Streetcars.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Manchester Didsbury Metrolink line.

Metrolink Name change

Metrolink name for this stop is now just Chorlton (source The Link 3), theyve dropped the 'cum-hardy' bit for obvious reasons. Question is since this page also refers to the former station should it be renamed or not? WatcherZero (talk) 03:48, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good Question. And of course the third option would be two articles, one for the old Chorlton-cum-Hardy station, and one for the new Metrolink station. I think this is a question for WT:GM, so I'll move the discussion there. -- Fursday 08:48, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Services section

I've updated the services section, and in it mentioned that the last north-bound terminate at Piccadilly. I'm struggling to find a reference on the metrolink website for this though, even though this fact is clearly marked on the platform noticeboards at the station.

Does anybody have any citable information regarding an increase in tram frequencies prior to the airport expansion also? My own original research (and therefore unusable - I was chatting to a few Metrolink staff) suggests that plans to extend frequencies to 6 minutes are presently under consideration based on passenger numbers since completion, but if anybody has any references to this then please feel free to add. -- Fursday 16:00, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chorlton tram stop. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:15, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]