Talk:Chocolate (Kylie Minogue song)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chocolate (Kylie Minogue song) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Chocolate (Kylie Minogue song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Chocolate (Kylie Minogue song) is part of the Body Language series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 3, 2014	Good article nominee	Listed
February 3, 2015	Good topic candidate	Promoted

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 7, 2014.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the music video for Kylie Minogue's 2004 single "Chocolate" features a 40-second ballet routine which took the singer four days to rehearse?

Current status: Good article

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong

Australia: Music Low‑importance

	Australia portal Chocolate (Kylie Minogue song) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian music (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Kylie Minogue Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kylie Minogue, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Kylie Minogue on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Kylie MinogueWikipedia:WikiProject Kylie MinogueTemplate:WikiProject Kylie MinogueKylie Minogue
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Music Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lyrics?

I am interested in expanding the article, but wish to question whether or not lyrics are acceptable on Wikipedia. Pointono 20:14, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article title

This should be moved to Chocolate (Kylie Minogue song), because there's an article on the Snow Patrol song "Chocolate" at Chocolate (single). Extraordinary Machine 20:33, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Chocolatemusicvideo.jpg

Image:Chocolatemusicvideo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:19, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Chocolate (Kylie Minogue song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Prism (talk · contribs) 11:41, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Prose and files

Lead

"It was written by Johnny Douglas and Karen Poole and produced by the former" → It was written by Johnny Douglas and its producer Karen Poole.
""Chocolate" is a ballad which describes Minogue's obsession with love using a chocolate simile" → "Chocolate" is a ballad which uses a chocolate simile to describe Minogue's obsession with love" (otherwise it is ambiguous)
I wouldn't use "old-fashioned" here. Perhaps "dated"?
"Elsewhere" is redundant
"An accompanying" → A (if it's a music video for "Chocolate", it's automatically an accompanying video)
"was presented as a tribute to Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer musicals" (is the video actually structured as a tribute to Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer musicals? I think it would be more clear if you changed that part to "was written/conceptualised/envisioned as a tribute (...)"
"Minogue performing a dance routine choreographed by Michael Rooney with numerous backup dancers in a hall" → "Minogue and numerous backup dancers, in a hall, performing a dance routine choreographed by Michael Rooney"
Could you try and substitute some mentions of "Chocolate" in the lead with "The song"/"It"? The use of the song title is repetitive.
"Additionally" is unnecessary

Background and composition

"The duo wrote "Chocolate" together" (together is redundant)

Removing "together" makes the sentence - "The duo wrote "Chocolate", while Douglas also handled the production of the song," which sounds very odd to me. "Together" helps emphasising that Poole was only involved with the writing process.

"personal favourites" → "favourites" (personal is redundant)
Chart sites are not reliable for track listings. Could you use Cite AV media notes or another website?
About.com is not reliable and is listed as a source to avoid on WP:ALBUM/REVSIT. You'll need to remove all the mention of quiet storm.
The sample size and quality are up to code, however you should change "32 seconds" to "30" on its file page, as that info is wrong.
The Spin ref shouldn't be in the middle of a sentence, especially if there isn't a comma/semi-colon before it. Place it on the end of the sentence.

Critical reception

Remove the About.com review
Remove the wikilink to PopMatters (as per WP:OVERLINK). The same goes for Spin and The Guardian.

Music video

"Aspinall felt that Minogue "absolutely looked the part" and found this to be the result of her relationship with then-boyfriend Olivier Martinez, a French actor" how so?

Live performances

IMDb is not reliable.

Track listing

Reminder: chart sites shouldn't be used for track listing

Yeah... I can't find anything else wrong with this article. Keep up the good work. pedro | talk 11:41, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Prism: Addressed all --WonderBoy1998 (talk) 12:51, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chocolate (Kylie Minogue song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131105232620/http://www.stylusmagazine.com/reviews/kylie-minogue/body-language.htm to http://www.stylusmagazine.com/reviews/kylie-minogue/body-language.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:34, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]