Talk:Choco pie

Korea Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by one or more inactive working groups.

Food and drink Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

Requested move 1 November 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 08:17, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Choco Pie → Choco pie – Since this not a proper noun, I recommend changing the name of this article from Choco Pie to Choco pie. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 10:34, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. — AjaxSmack 00:04, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
~~Well, but wait.~~ There is no such English word as "choco" AFAIK. Either there is a thing called a "Choco Pie" and that is its proper name, or we have...I don't know, "chocolate pie" I guess. Looking at the article, it appears that there are two things being talked about here: some actual products with an actual proper brand name of "Choco Pie", and some other things -- moon pies (or Moon Pies) and so on. It's possible that "choco pie" is now a genericized term, but I'm not sure of this. I would recommend at least considering leaving the name alone, or changing it to "Chocolate pie", although the OP's suggestion might be OK if this really is a genericized brand name... Herostratus (talk) 00:40, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I would support keeping as is if a singular brand name, but I do not believe it is. This name of a product seems similar to Moon pie, where there are several companies that make them. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 01:06, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Herostratus: scotcheroos, bossche bolen and honmei choco are not English words either but they are still not proper nouns. Read the article; it tells exactly how the name choco pie became genericized. — AjaxSmack 06:13, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK. This seems right. User:AjaxSmack makes a cogent point re the word "choco". The difficult thing for me is that it's not a word in an English-speaking country. I did not know that Korean used an alphabet, though. It's not entirely clear to me that I could make and market "Herostratus's choco pies" here in the USA, I guess... Korean intellectual property rights apply here by treaty (I think) but Korean court rules re what is and is not intellectual property are not binding or even necesarily considered in our courts (I think)... but OK. Herostratus (talk) 07:13, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support per all of above. N.B.: Article text needs to be rewritten to match title after and if the move is made. Herostratus (talk) 07:13, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Choco pie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110711020145/http://members.forbes.com/global/2006/0227/026A.html to http://members.forbes.com/global/2006/0227/026A.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:11, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Choco-Pie Packaging.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:37, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Chocolate pie" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Chocolate pie and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 10#Chocolate pie until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jay 💬 16:51, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]