Jump to content

Talk:Chlemoutsi/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 21:29, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Will review over the weekend.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:29, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I copyedited per my copyediting disclaimer, down to Keep. These are my edits. Concerning: "Andravida, some 13 kilometres (8.1 mi) away, and the Principality's largest port and town, Glarentza (c. 5 kilometres (3.1 mi)).": avoid "))". Also: "some" and "c." suggest it's approximate, but "8.1" and "3.1" suggest it's not. - Dank (push to talk) 14:49, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lead and infobox
  • No coordinates?
  • Add convert template for 226 m
History
  • "13 km (about 8 mi) away, and the Principality's largest port and town, Glarentza (c. 5 km or 3 mi). " use Template:Convert.
  • A. Bon -who is he??
Outer ward
  • Add convert templates for 5 and 10 metres.
Keep
  • Why "apparently judged"?

@Cplakidas: Looks in good shape, just those very minor things and I'll pass it!♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:14, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to both of you for your work! I made the required changes. Thanks to Dank for the thumbs up, and over to you dear Dr. Blofeld: other than technical issues and GA requirements, how do you rate it? You have more experience with articles on towns etc, so in your view, is anything lacking, should I add more detail/context/something else? Constantine 16:17, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you know what is available for it, but it certainly covers what is necessary to pass GA which I will do now. You might though add a bit to the lead on the architecture just so it covers the whole article though.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:14, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: