Jump to content

Talk:Chlamydia (genus)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Untitled

[edit]

Where does Chlamydophila pneumoniae fit into the species types?

Do chlamydia have lipopolysaccharides (LPS)?

[edit]

does chlamydia have LPS? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.181.236.3 (talk) 21:18, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, AFIK all GM(-) bacteria express LPS. Here's a specific reference for Chlamydia: http://www.chlamydiae.com/docs/biology/env_lps.asp Mark Lundquist (talk) 22:36, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

could defnitely talk more about the 1999 revision of genuses and species.

[edit]

that topic probably deserves its own section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.181.236.3 (talk) 21:39, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup

[edit]

I'm no microbiologist, so I can't do it, but the sections titled Genome structure and Pathology really need a very serious rewrite. It's not about the technical material, I can't judge that, it's the composition. For instance, Genome structure contains material that does not seem to be related to genome at all, but to other characteristics of the organism. Pathology only mentions STD and completely ignores ocular Chlamydia infection, a major world health problem. Pathology also really only discusses symptoms and diagnosis, not the pathological activity of the organism at all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 7802mark (talkcontribs) 21:37, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree about the pathology section. I would add that it should address the affect of blindness as mentioned in the introduction section.--MeaniePanini (talk) 18:32, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chlamydia (genus). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:56, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chlamydia (genus). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:25, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]