Jump to content

Talk:Chiefs–Raiders rivalry

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge

[edit]

It could use expansion (i.e. game list), but I don't think it should be merged. Pats1 00:48, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've been meaning to work on this article. DO NOT MERGE IT! This is a very important rivalry in the NFL and it needs to have a separate article. Just have some patience, I will begin to work on it. Conman33 18:58, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:KansasCityChiefs 1000.png

[edit]

Image:KansasCityChiefs 1000.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 03:45, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The image Image:Kansas City Chiefs logo.svg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --00:46, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revert of "Undo" to History Section

[edit]

I reverted the "undo" of the History section because the previous version was a mess. The undo also removed valid citations.

The previous version was out-dated, one-sided, tautologous, trivial, and had many flaws of grammar. There is no need to repeatedly say that the Raiders and Chiefs faced each other on "Sunday," or to cite the NFL week. It is sufficient to simply state the date of the respective game.

For a page dedicated to a rivalry, it was clear that the page was solely from the perspective of Chiefs fans - citing a victory in 2008 yet omitting a career day by Darren McFadden against the Chiefs in the same year.

The previous section makes reference to a match between the Raiders and Chiefs in November of 2010, but does not include the outcome. Instead, it includes rambling trivia about the game.

I moved the line that "15 of the last 13 games have been settled by 7 points or less" from Rivalry Statistics to History, because that information is more pertinent to the recent history of match ups included under the History section.

The previous section makes references to the Chiefs expired streak of wins in Oakland, but no reference to the Raiders current streak of wins in Arrowhead. 67.169.25.132 (talk)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chiefs–Raiders rivalry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:28, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chiefs–Raiders rivalry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:33, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Content update

[edit]

Hi Wikipedians!

I just wanted to let y’all know that I’ve updated the information to reflect the most recent results. KevinML (talk) 04:35, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]