Talk:Chichali (archaeological site)

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

India: Madhya Pradesh Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Madhya Pradesh (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article was last assessed in September 2018.

Peer Review

I like the start of your article, You were very precise on the excavation also artifacts. Did you find any oral history of your site? What do the people of the region want done with the site? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blong31 (talk • contribs) 12:49, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

I enjoyed your article I think your writing style was easy to understand. I would definitely like you to expand on the figures found. Was there any additional details? Did they have photos? I think if you could find photos adding more specifics on what they look like would be great. I would also move the anthropomorphic figures section underneath the excavation section for better flow. All in all it was a good overview/baseline that can easily be the starting point for further research- well done. -Dani — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dani.xcv (talk • contribs) 20:01, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

The accuracy and specificity of your article is excellent and easy to understand for a non-archaeology based audience. Adding more details to describe the artifacts would benefit your article like photos of the artifacts if that's available. You started in a good place to begin and potentially adding in the culture of the people or just the lifestyle that could have or was there would be a suggested addition. -Carol ScroogeCNL (talk) 17:38, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]