Talk:Chic (magazine)

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Requested move 2 December 2024

It has been proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved.

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

– Resolve WP:PDAB situation - Chic (pornographic magazine) gets the most views, and it's never appropriate for two different articles to both have disambiguators that can refer to each other. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 02:31, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support ~~1st, oppose 2nd~~. Theparties (talk) 03:01, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What's wrong with the second one? The problem there is that Chic (magazine) is also a women's magazine. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:06, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support 1st, no comment on 2nd. The lifestyle one has 103 views but the pornographic one has 446 and the woman's one has 4[[1]]. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:37, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]