Talk:Chester-le-Street (district)

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The formatting on the electoral wards is slightly confusing here. And Urpeth (normally known as Urpeth Grange) and Grange Villa are quite far apart - I'd be suprised if they are in the same electoral ward.

--Peternkirk111 14:40, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted name change?

Why was the name changed from Chester-le-Street District back to Chester-le-Street (district) (with edit summary “restore naming convention”)?

I can't find such a convention at WP:NAME or Wikipedia:Naming conventions (places)
articles for several UK districts and boroughs do not have parentheses
WP:DAB says If there is a choice between using a short phrase and word with context, there is no hard rule about which is preferred
unnecessary parentheses look ugly, and ~~need~~ attract piped links in prose.

--Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 05:21, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Check out Category:Shire districts. We used the simple name e.g. Spelthorne where that is available. If that is not available we have used the name with "(borough)" or "(district)" at the end. MRSC • Talk 06:52, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Some of these have had their official names, and the parentheses added later. I think my justifications (above) are stronger than an unwritten convention, but I can't be bothered with starting a debate for each one. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 20:26, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chester-le-Street (district). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20020405135659/http://www.chester-le-street.gov.uk/hist.html to http://www.chester-le-street.gov.uk/hist.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:28, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]