Talk:Cheshire archers

Cheshire Low‑importance

	Cheshire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cheshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cheshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CheshireWikipedia:WikiProject CheshireTemplate:WikiProject CheshireCheshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: British / European / Medieval

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)

Merge with "Yeoman Archer"?

Hi, ya'll!! I've just split Yeoman Archer from its parent article Yeoman, and I noticed this stub article in my search results. It would appear that this article (and its missing sibling on the Lancashire archers) could be merged into into Yeoman Archer#Edward I. This section discusses the beginning of the Yeoman Archers with Edward I's conquest of Wales & his later campaigns against Scotland. The first campaign against Scotland included the Cheshire & Lancashire levies, including their famed archers. I also have a separate section on another split-off Yeoman (Household Servant)#Yeoman of the Crown which can pick the story about Richard II's Yeomen (if it belongs there). That is, unless someone in Cheshire feels strongly about keeping this article (which hasn't been touched for 6 years)?? As it stands, it's pretty lonesome... This wouldn't happen for a good while yet - I have to finish "Yeoman Archer", & finish (& then split) A Gest of Robyn Hode ... Ta-ta for now!! --AnalyticalHistoricalHobbyist (talk) 19:40, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]