Jump to content

Talk:Cheryll Tickle

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 August 2021 and 10 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): MortonA18 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Hgabrie, NickMcCo.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 August 2021 and 10 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): MortonA18. Peer reviewers: Hgabrie, NickMcCo.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:20, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

[edit]

See the discussion at:

This is one of a series of 32 articles about Fellows of the Royal Society that were erroneously deleted on the grounds of notability. Only leading scientists can become Fellows of the Royal Society and all have long since met the requirements of our Notability (academics) guideline by the time they become fellows.
--A. B. (talkcontribs) 00:08, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are there independent and reliable references which support the assertion that every single "Fellow" in the history of the Society was a distinguished scientist? Asserting it does not constitute proof. It was not always the case that only "leading scientists " could ever become Fellows. The society's own history [1] speaks of the vague criteria for membership in the early years, and of the admission of "wealthy amateurs" mostly for their likely donations in the 1820's. Nice improvements to the article, by the way. Would that people would take the time to create an article with some content rather than making Wikipedia a sparse mirror of some membership directory or other. Edison (talk) 19:25, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Cheryll Tickle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:51, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

YouTube Resource

[edit]

Hello, I am a student at Clemson University and have chosen to edit this article as part of my honors project. The YouTube link is to a recent (2021) presentation where Cheryll Tickle herself discussed her own research history/timeline and it was given to me by my professor. She begins speaking around the 50 minute mark. Thank you.--MortonA18 (talk) 02:59, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]