Jump to content

Talk:Cheryl Rainfield

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cheryl Rainfield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:43, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Implication of term "Ritual Abuse"

[edit]

I know almost nothing about Cheryl Rainfield, but the first line of the page currently describes her as an "incest and ritual abuse survivor".

The term "ritual abuse" currently redirects to the term "Satanic panic", which is an [I believe definitionally] unsubstantiated abuse. I understand that the usage of this term is taken from Cheryl's own autobiographical information on their website. Regardless, the implied meaning for me as an otherwise uninvested reader is that Cheryl Rainfield's self-assessment is dubious.

If anyone more invested in this has a mechanism for clarifying this -- either using a different term that doesn't imply her claims are likely spurious, or explaining why they're likely to be spurious -- I think it would be helpful. Dabizi~enwiki (talk) 15:41, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]