Talk:Cheryl Dunn
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Notability
[edit]The references in this article need sorting out - I've copy-edited this version to remove peacock language and waffle, and I think the subject *is* notable after a fashion, but this isn't a place for a resume or self-promotion. If it's to be deleted, I think AFD is the way to go; notability is established in references / external links. Thanks, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 18:18, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- I second. Subject has a degree of notability. To delete without discussion would be controversial. Pianotech 01:21, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
External links
[edit]I have pruned the external links down to four. Per WP:EL, the previous 28 links were far too excessive. In fact, the four that I have temporarily left in the article need to be processed: Examine each source. If it is reliable and if it contains any relevant and significant information, use it to build the article with the source as a reference. Then remove from external links. We definitely do not list sites merely because they refer to the subject, see WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Johnuniq (talk) 08:05, 26 July 2010 (UTC)