Talk:Chemical terrorism

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chemical terrorism article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.

Chemistry Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Crime and Criminal Biography: Terrorism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Terrorism task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Citizendium Porting (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Citizendium Porting, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Citizendium PortingWikipedia:WikiProject Citizendium PortingTemplate:WikiProject Citizendium PortingCitizendium Porting articles

Moving forward

On 11 January 2010 I nominated this article for WP:PROD as unreferenced original research. No one objected in the ensuing week's time. In closing the uncontested PROD a week later admin User:Jclemens said in his edit summary "Decline PROD, feel free to take to AfD. It's been around for a year and a half, seems to be discussing valid topics--can it be saved? Let AfD decide." I responded in another edit summary with "To be honest I am tired of taking poorly written and unref articles to AfD where everyone says "keep" and then walks away leaving a poor quality article. Tagged instead to warn readers art unreliable." I have tagged the article to show where the problems exist and there are lots of them. Essentially this article is just a text dump from the Citizendium article that is marked as "This is a draft article, under development and not meant to be cited; you can help to improve it." From a licencing point of view this is acceptable and not a copyright violation, but the Citizendium is poorly written, cites no sources itself, even though encyclopedia articles should do so, is full of unattributed quotes and reads like a personal essay. So all we have here is a copy of a poorly written and unreferenced essay. As noted above I am tired of taking articles to AfD where everyone says "keep" and then walks away leaving the poor quality article to remain. This approach doesn't make Wikipedia better. As an alternative to AfD I instead propose removing all the unsourced and poorly written text and reducing this article to the lead para, with a hidden note asking that additions comply with WP:V. I'll leave this proposal open for a week to see if there are any objections. - Ahunt (talk) 14:35, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Since a week has now passed with no objections, in accordance with WP:SILENCE we have a consensus to stubify this article. - Ahunt (talk) 15:52, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chemical terrorism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120214133920/http://www.spirit.tau.ac.il/government/robinson1_Ch13.pdf to http://www.spirit.tau.ac.il/government/robinson1_Ch13.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:49, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

- Ahunt (talk) 12:34, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]