Jump to content

Talk:Chemical specificity

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Davidho3. Peer reviewers: Sazhnyev.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:18, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed edits of this page

[edit]

Hello Wikipedia users,

I plan to develop the chemical specificity page with the following edits in the near future and would appreciate any feedback or concerns.

The primary changes entail:

1) A section regarding the sources responsible for chemical specificity. This includes a description of how electrostatic and hydrophobic effects often play an integral role in how attraction occurs between two molecules. Shape complementarity is also crucial for chemical specificity. Text on how these attractive forces along with shape complementary combine to tremendously affect chemical specificity will be discussed.

2) The different types of categorizations that fit under the general umbrella of chemical specificity.

  • absolute specificity
  • group specificity
  • linkage specificity
  • stereochemical specificity

3) The importance of chemical specificity

There are various areas in which chemical specificity is necessary.

I am planning to split these section off until two sections: its importance in relation to biological function processes such as hemoglobin and its importance in releasing oxygen throughout the body, as well as importance in relation to research techniques and advances such as immunostaining. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidho3 (talkcontribs) 06:37, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chemical specificity. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:47, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Specificity - Selectivity

[edit]

A differentiation between specificity and selectivity would be helpful. Unfortunately I coudn't find any good sources for that yet, it seems like those two terms are mostly used interchangeably.

Anataban (talk) 19:41, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]