Jump to content

Talk:Cheam

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Whitehall

[edit]

Hello. The introduction refers to Whitehall Gallery but I can't find any other reference to Whitehall being a gallery but rather a historic house and museum. Curiositas42 (talk) 19:47, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Hancock

[edit]

Shouldn't we mention Tony Hancock and Railway Cuttings, East Cheam ? -- Beardo 06:37, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree --Davelane (talk) 21:46, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cheam and North Cheam

[edit]

Are you sure that Cheam and North Cheam are separate towns in different boroughs? I live in "North Cheam" and live in the London Borough of Sutton. Is Cheam not in the London Borough of Sutton? -- Realtaichi 12:15, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

World War One?

[edit]

During World War One, many of Cheam's historic buildings and character were destroyed. Only one major building survived, a small white timber framed cottage, called "Whitehall".

This is surely not true, Cheam suffered no significant damage in either WW1 or WW2. Old buildings were replaced by natural development and 1930s road widening. Also numerous old buildings still exist in Cheam as old as Whitehall, such as Red Lion and the Old Cottage. ––richit 16:58, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Small Village

[edit]

The claim that Cheam is a "small village" is a little odd. In terms of size I'd say it was a large town. Mucky Duck 09:32, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that Cheam is not small, however it is a village and not a town. –– richit 16:56, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oh yes, no argument about that: I meant it only in size terms. Your change hits the nail on the head. Mucky Duck 12:11, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsuch Palace

[edit]

Shouldn't this also be mentioned or at least the pages linked to each other - or is this not in Cheam. --Davelane (talk) 21:45, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

UFO

[edit]

Hello, On new year's day, 2009 (the very start of it), I witnessed a orange ball of light. Anyway, I have found an article about a UFO in North Cheam and I was wondering if we should include it here? :

http://www.suttonguardian.co.uk/news/4299744.Close_encounters_of_the_Cheam_kind/

Thank you (86.169.125.18 (talk) 01:05, 2 August 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Better photos needed

[edit]

The photo of N Cheam in 2009 is not very representative of Cheam as a whole, especially as Woolworths closed down shortly thereafter. A couple of good photos of Cheam Village would be much better.

Have since added a couple myself (during February)

A P Monblat (talk) 03:42, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Cheam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:37, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Cheam. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:16, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cheam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:08, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cheam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:11, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cheam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:08, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Cheam&oldid=1258472510"