Talk:Charm School with Ricki Lake

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Reason to not delete page:

Before the reason this page was deleted was because it lacked information that has now become available. The title has changed, the hosts and cast has become available, as well as the official airing date. There are no plagerized parts to this article like the last deleted one contained. Andrew097 (talk) 20:21, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is still sourced to a blog and still something which hasn't happened yet. Its virtually the same article. Do you have any reliable sources? KillerChihuahua^?!? 21:25, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that a blog is not considered a reliable source, but it does contain information right from the broadcasting channel. I found other more "reliable" sources such as Broadcasting&Cable http://www.broadcastingcable.com/blog/BC_Beat/11066-Ricki_Lake_to_Tame_the_Girls_of_Charm_School.php and BreitBart.com http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=prnw.20090407.NY95464&show_article=1&catnum=6. Please reconsider because other articles on upcoming reality series have even less information such as Megan Wants a Millionaire. Andrew097 (talk) 21:34, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Add the BreitBart source; the BroadcastingCable one is another blog. Please note that Other crap exists is not a reason to keep. KillerChihuahua^?!? 22:16, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

- The photos/cast list and the like are actually confirmed and have been released by VH1 Blog. This is an OFFICIAL blog from the channel and is 100% a reliable source of infomation regarding the show. 92.23.182.66 (talk) 22:33, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the references from Broadcasting&Cable.com to Breitbart.com Andrew097 (talk) 22:35, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also add the links to the RCoL girls and the RoLBus girls reveal pages too for added infomation and citation Jamesbuc (talk) 22:40, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have withdrawn my prod for speedy, as it no longer counts a simple recreation of deleted material. However, it could still be considered for AFD if someone feels strongly enough to nominate it. Plastikspork (talk) 22:44, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Names

Do we really need to put unlisted nicknames on here? For example "Brazil"(A nickname not listed as her name on the show) next to Marcia, and Jasmineva and Kareena next to Brittaney and Gia? I understand Jasmineva and Kareena may be their real names, but shouldn't we leave it how it is listed on the shows they were on? Andrew097 (talk) 23:52, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, you should delete them. Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 16:03, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree. I think you should list their names. They may be their real names so I think you should put it on. I mean it is their real name any way. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yocca101 (talk • contribs) 15:04, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Other

Please do not post results of eliminations before the episode has aired!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eagle2ch (talk • contribs) 04:14, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes please don't that is serious bullshit. I came to see who was on the show, yet I get spoilers?? WTF. That makes me not want to come to Wikipedia again, so please chill out on that —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.240.184.44 (talk) 22:22, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-Protection

I'm tired of constantly cleaning up vandilism and spoilers. Nominated for Semi-Protection.Wikiguy09 (talk) 02:35, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing as how this is my last time ever relying on Wikipedia, I would go with Wikiguy09's nomination, because this is bullcrap when you come to Wikipedia to get updates, but instead you get spoilers. You don't want people to stop coming to Wikipedia, like myself, over this crap! So please put either FULL or Semi-protection on this page. (Note: I think every VH1 or any reality show should be locked so that no one but officials could put in current data) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.240.147.13 (talk) 21:50, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Beverly: DISQ or OUT?

This thing keeps changing! She should be labeled as DISQ since OUT means they were expelled after being sent to Detention Hall. A.G. (talk) 02:41, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No she should be labelled DQ as DQ not DSIQ is used for most, if not all reality show disqualifications 92.23.115.3 (talk) 21:09, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

EDITING OF PAGE

DO NOT EDIT PAGE IF YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU'RE DOING! PLEASE & THANK YOU! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thewidow 02 (talk • contribs) 20:17, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This needs to be semi-protected again!

Too many vandals by people not knowing how to make a basic chart. LOL! A.G. (talk) 19:50, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed - also, cliffhangers (ie episodes that end with "to be continued") are not grounds to make absolute edits based on predictions through the article. 74.211.36.35 (talk) 05:08, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Last names

The addition of last names of contestants must be accompanied by a verifiable reliable source. Any unsourced additions will be removed. Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 14:43, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Winner Of Charm School

The winner of Charm School has not been announced on VH1. But when they do announce the winner, someone on here will edit this page out and post the winner for you guys. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tisdalea9 (talk • contribs) 22:18, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No Charm School 3 Reunion

According to VH1, There will be NOO Charm School 3 reunion. They probably will not have it because maybe the girls will start fighting or maybe the Brittanya vs. So Hood sitiuation. I don't know. No one knows. But, all we know is there will be NOOOO reunion. And I was whating for the reunion too.

What the hell? That f***ing sucks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.224.58.188 (talk) 06:37, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Link Removal

The link for Gia Lynn leads to a site that has been tagged as an attack site. It should be removed to prevent harm to users computers. DakotaDAllen (talk) 03:01, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done Plastikspork (talk) 03:18, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gia's last name IS Lynn, so keep that. A.G. (talk) 21:15, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sure if we can locate a WP:RS that's not an attack site. Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 21:21, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Marcia in second?

I feel Marcia should be moved to the second position because she's won more challenges than Ashley, and been called down alot less than Ashley. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hatenkoe (talk • contribs) 19:19, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the names are alphabetical. DakotaDAllen (talk) 20:39, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, it should be alphabetical. Plastikspork (talk)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Charm School with Ricki Lake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:03, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]