Talk:Charlotte Fairbanks

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): W.Henley. Peer reviewers: Honestbean, Significantfigure.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:52, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Significantfigure's Peer Review

This is an overall good lead section. It gets right to the point about who Charlotte was and what her contributions were to the field of medicine. I would suggest just being consistent with the way you abbreviate "B.A.","PhD", and "MD". They are all abbreviated right, but I would either use period in all of them or none of them. All of your citations look good as well. I clicked on all of them and they brought me to the appropriate place. They all are good scholarly, unbiased sources. Your content is also very neutral and you are not bringing any bias in. I know there is probably not much about how she died, but it may be interesting to note-- not the most important thing though. Going forward it would be nice to structure the article by splitting the information up into sections when you find more information about her. One section may just focus on her early life/family and another section may focus on her work. Overall, it sounds very encyclopedic.

Significantfigure (talk) 22:49, 10 February 2018 (UTC)Significantfigure[reply]

Honestbean's Peer Review

The lead section is very strong. The sources seem to be scholarly and relevant. One thing that seemed a little out of place to me in the introduction paragraph was that when mentioning that she was the granddaughter of Sir Thaddeus Fairbanks, go on to elaborate that he "was honored for his development of a more accurate weighing scale." This may belong on a different Wikipedia page, unless his development of a more accurate scale also had a profound impact on her life, or she worked closely with him. It might also have a better place in a latter subsection.

Honestbean (talk) 23:41, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]