Talk:Charles Wiggin (rower)

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Olympics

	Olympic Games portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Monmouth School Alumni

I've begun a discussion on the Monmouth School Talkpage regarding the criteria for including alumni. You may wish to contribute. For ease, I've reproduced the entry below. Regards. KJP1 (talk) 22:15, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alumni revisited

In the discussion above, it was suggested a minimum criteria for inclusion as an alumni would be that the subject has their own Wikipedia entry. I actually wonder whether this is sufficient. Looking at a number of the Sporting and Arts and Entertainment alumni, their Wikipedia articles are of very poor quality. They are often short, poorly referenced - if referenced at all, and a number have all the hallmarks of autobiographical entries, created either by their subjects, or by collaborators. That said, I fully appreciate the very great difficulties of deciding on alternative criteria. Hence, I'd appreciate others' thoughts. KJP1 (talk) 18:20, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]