Jump to content

Talk:Charles Taylor (North Carolina politician)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Initial discussion

[edit]

Article has a clearly admiring tone toward Rep. Taylor. See the extended quote from the Citizen Times. I don't know if the facts are out of order, but the tone should be corrected.

LegCircus 22:48, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, it looks like previously the page had been primarily criticisms of Taylor and somebody decided that erasing all the criticism and writing a bunch of praise would make the article more "balanced."

LegCircus 23:06, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Also, references to his CAFTA vote seem to have been excised. Whether or not you agree with the legislation, it made minor headlines earlier this year when he cried on the House floor after Tom DeLay twisted his arm to vote YEA on the bill. This was the impetus for Washington Redskins quarterback Heath Shuler to go for his seat in the 2006 midterm elections -- another fact which is suspiciously omitted.

AnthonySF 21:44, 22 October 2005

I've removed the extended quote, but left mention of it and the link in place. 68.39.174.238 23:58, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removing the negatives

[edit]

70.109.203.236 said, in his edit summary: Entry had been edited to be heavily biased against Taylor. Added edits based largely on more unbiased and less opionated content from http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Charles_Taylor)

I'd revert the entire edit except that some information was added and I agree that it should be there. I note the following in explaining why I'm putting BACK most of the stuff that was deleted:

  • The edit shows its bias by including the one favorable thing (Taylor's actions on "Rubbergate") twice.
  • The goal of wikipedia is NOT to have balanced articles. If a person does a lot of newsworthy things that people consider bad (say, Jack Abramoff), then the article should reflect that. If Taylor has done a lot of good things that aren't mentioned, then the solution is to add them, not to delete objective, verifiable but negative information.
  • The goal of wikipedia is not to limit itself to material in sourcewatch.org, and sourcewatch.org in no way is a model for what wikipedia should be.
  • The article is clearly too short now, and pretty bland (a list of committees that Taylor was on - important??), yet another reason why it's biased to remove so much material.
  • This is the only contribution to wikipedia to date by the anonymous user.

John Broughton 12:40, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article in WSJ

[edit]

Today on Chuck Taylor. If only I kud reed -- Kendrick7 15:05, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That would be the one titled "Seat in Congress Helps Mr. Taylor Help His Business: Lawmaker Pushes Earmarks For Projects Near His Land; He Says District Benefits". John Broughton | Talk 17:46, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note to 69.249.253.211

[edit]

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you.

This IP has been editing political articles with the aim of eliminating any negative comments/facts regarding Republican candidates. Viewing 69.249.253.211's edit history would show this.Thesilence 20:16, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism missing

[edit]

After not seeing this page for several years, I came back and found it lacking significant information relevant to his performance, actions, and public opinion. The section on environment, for example, gives the impression that he was environmentally friendly, and omits the Wiki-worthy nickname Taylor earned: "Chainsaw Charlie." On the whole, it seems as though the article was washed, leaving behind a boring list of affiliations while failing to inform the audience of the man, the politics, and the controversies. It didn't even mention the campaign promises he made during his unsuccessful re-election campaign that he would deliver millions of dollars to UNC–Asheville if he won. Mention his victories and successes (many of which are missing), but also the less pleasant (and equally relevant) facts. Too much is missing on both sides. I guess my question is, did I miss something, or was this just the result of vandalism over the years? TEPutnam (talk) 00:26, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

POV

[edit]

Stating that the "wise use" movement is "anti-environment" is POV> This is a widely-held opinion but nontheless a biased one; the comments in this section are not, as crrently headed, outside the scope of the article, but rather editorializing and POV. 75.201.91.33 (talk) 02:55, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pointing that out. You're right. I went in and cleaned up the section some to try to make it more neutral and took out inline external link to open source/user-edited site. That shouldn't have been included in the first place. Definitely editorializing. Hope this is a little better. I'm sure the rest of the article needs work as well. Will see what I can do if I have time. Thank you. -- JoannaSerah (talk) 15:30, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Charles H. Taylor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:33, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Charles H. Taylor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:20, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Charles_Taylor_(North_Carolina_politician)&oldid=1255787019"