Talk:Charles Spencer-Churchill, 9th Duke of Marlborough

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics of the United Kingdom

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Biography: Peerage and Baronetage / Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage.
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

Photo

I am removing a photo of the duke as it is superfluous. The same photo - enlarged - is in the box.--Brenont (talk) 21:08, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Insane omission

What'd he die of? It's a glaring omission. Not even a SENTENCE on his death. This doesn't make Wikipedia look good. One's first speculation as to why such an omission might occur is that he died of a venereal disease and Wikipedia is shamefully capitulating to "influence" from a prominent family and keeping it quiet. If that is what is going on, note my protest that it's not what a reputable encyclopedia does. Or did he die by suicide? Same thing. Say so. Don't bow to pressure. If on the other hand his death is NOT scandalous, merely omitted without a political reason, it's not a COMPETENT look for you even though it might not be a MACHIAVELLIAN one.2603:7000:9906:A91C:1C64:8308:33BC:E2D6 (talk) 00:14, 26 June 2021 (UTC)Christopher L. Simpson[reply]

Do you have any reliable sources we can use for his death? Or are you just speculating wildly? DuncanHill (talk) 00:25, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May I add the question: "Where did he die?"? Unreliable sources differ: familysearch.org says London; wikitree.com says Blenheim Palace. Philip Trueman (talk) 04:12, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I must agree that the precipitous end of this article ("two years later [he] evicted her", meaning approximately 1929) is crazy. All we have after that is the date of his death. Not the place, not the cause, no mention of burial site. The whole last 5 years of his life vanish. Unlike @Christopher L. Simpson, I don't assume it was hushed up, but imagine someone got lazy. Surely this information is out there (Debrett's?): this guy was Duke of Marlborough and a cousin of Winston Churchill. At least @Philip Trueman looked. I did too, but all the circular-language fluff on the Web got in the way. JingleJim (talk) 13:09, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So, you couldn't find it so other editors must be lazy? DuncanHill (talk) 13:20, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Sunny Marlborough" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Sunny Marlborough has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 11 § Sunny Marlborough until a consensus is reached. estar8806 (talk) ★ 11:52, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]