Talk:Charles Corver

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group.

Football: Netherlands Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Dutch football task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Referees High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the Referees WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Referees. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.RefereesWikipedia:WikiProject RefereesTemplate:WikiProject RefereesReferees articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Netherlands

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles

Untitled

Made this more neutral and corrected a few grammar errors.

Schumacher challenge

Did Corver ever explain why he deemed Schumacher's challenge to be not a foul? Jess Cully 22:48, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In football a foul of the goalkeeper is,if he stops the player before shooting the ball.But Battiston has shot the ball and has had no chance to reach it.Not every injuring in football can be seen as a foul, it might be a unhappy crash.A foul is too when you try to hurt your opponent by using your shoes but not if he raises your foot against you you put your knees and your front leg against him.If Battiston would have left his leg above Schumacher would have several bones broken and Battiston would have committed no foul,because it was out of the five meter area.

That's not even close. The laws at the time stated that if a player deliberately made contact with an opponent it was a foul. Regardless of where the ball was. It was a dreadful foul and I do not know why Corver has never been pursued in relation to it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.62.8.21 (talk) 15:08, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it`s not even close.If a Mercedesdriver and a Fiat 500 driver crash in a narrow street with full speed together the Mercedesdriver is not automatically guilty.One rule can be used against Schumacher,the rule not to jump at the player,but the goalkeeper has to jump to get the ball and if this would be a foul, dozens of fouls would be committed every match, the refree wouldn`t stop whisteling.I think it was a unhappy crash. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.187.225.2 (talk) 21:40, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is a real good joke to sign the decision for Schumacher as one of the worst decisions ever made.Coerver was not a unknown referee with primitive intentions,who comes and goes.He was a referee with very good references and also a dutch referee who doesn´t advatadge Germany.The ones who wanted to have a penalty almost french people,didn´t consider, that the ball was already gone.And a intended foul it was never.My father is amateur referee and said,if the goalkeeper comes out to take the ball it´s own risk to run there.The red card of Jens Lehmann in the champion league final 2005/6 was absolutely all right,because he snatched with his hand the leg of the forward to make him fall. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.187.214.11 (talk) 20:33, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In spite of the fact that the discussion seems to have ended nearly three years ago, I saw a bit of a documentary on Dutch television in which Corver stated that he would have sent off and showed Schumacher a red card if he had had a better view of what had happened. His assistant had also told him at that moment that it was just an accident. So Corver himself has marked it as a bad decision. Paul Pl (talk) 14:48, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Charles Corver. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070518185808/http://www.weltfussball.de:80/schiedsrichter_profil.php?id=18426 to http://www.weltfussball.de/schiedsrichter_profil.php?id=18426

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:43, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]