Talk:China Dinosaurs Park
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the China Dinosaurs Park article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | This article is the subject of an educational assignment supported by Wikipedia:WikiProject China/NNU Class Project |
Merge needed
[edit]Changzhou China Dinosaur Park and China Dinosaur Park cover the same subject. I've found a couple of potential sources, which I have left over at Talk:China Dinosaur Park. Ian.thomson (talk) 14:11, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, I see it's been done. How did my signature not get in here the first time? Ian.thomson (talk) 14:11, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
It doesn't google. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:10, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
Maybe Sinosauropteryx?? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 04:13, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
Review
[edit]I made a short review of the article. I seems notable and thus useful for wikipedia (although I can't read the references). A couple of comments/questions:
- I know we have been playing with the name. But what isthe best translation: Changzhou China Dinosaur Park , China Dinosaur Park , or China Dinosaur(s) Land, or something else?
- The article needs sections (see the references section for how to make them)
- The article has bare references, which need to be filled in. See Changzhou comb for a complicated and Tomato_and_egg_soup for a simpler (but less nice) way.
- I wonder what the value is of the recommendation of "Changzhou Travel and Tourism Administration". Such bureaux are generally overly positive. Wouldn't it be better to leave it out? and what does "as the most amusing base " mean? ....of the world?
- the park focusses on xxx environment... I think it focusses on Dinosaurs!, maybe better: natural environement is also a theme?
- what is a "symbolic building"
- sceleton of which dinosaur? (and is it a real one?)
- the names of the attractions are not very useful. explain if it is a ride, or something else...
- do not use words like "attractive"/big. It is not an essay, but a neutral encyclopedia entry (which is mor formal)
- I miss critical information: when was it established? who owns it? do we know how many visitors?
Anyway, good luck. For questions, just ask me on my talk page! L.tak (talk) 07:29, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
Content assessment
[edit]I think there are many incomplete entries, some worth visiting attractions are not mentioned, and this is the Chinese Dinosaur Park, but most of the content does not mention the Chinese Dinosaur Museum and dinosaurs. 왕예화 (talk) 05:12, 20 May 2024 (UTC)