Talk:Chamilo

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Low-importance).

Hi there, Chamilo is a software currently used by (at least) 230,000 users around the world (see http://version.chamilo.org/community.php and the stats collecting procedure described at the end to get an idea) and by at least 25 multi-thousand students universities, with a current growth rate of 1000 users per week. It has been under massive development (see http://www.ohloh.net/p/chamilo for stats) and started as a fork of another big e-learning software called Dokeos, with the whole community moving out, so I'm having a hard time finding out how it is not relevant or notable. We also have one single campus where more than 38000 teachers and students share free and open courses. It is true that, so far, the software hasn't had any publication in major press websites, but it's also less than one year old (and its history is not unlike the OpenOffice.org <-> LibreOffice story). I am definitely wanting to do what it takes to demonstrate the notability of this software project, but I am upset not to receive any alert e-mail when somebody is putting the article under scrutiny (is that normal?). It has taken a long time collecting the information and I will continue updating the page. Please help me doing the right thing for the majority. Ywarnier (talk) 22:15, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removed the deletion proposal after adding more information and links. If you think it is still lacking notability, please go into the details (how many referrals should it have to be considered notable?). Thanks for your dedication to making a better Wikipedia! Ywarnier (talk) 22:41, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Chamilo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:59, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]