Talk:Chachani/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 04:13, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
Hi - I'll make copyedits as I go (please revert if I inadvertently change the meaning) and jot queries below: Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 04:13, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
-
The volcano consists of several lava domes and individual volcanoes such as Nocarane,- "volcano consisting of...volcanoes" looks/sounds odd.- Changed to "it". Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:26, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
-
in fact, decide whether its a volcano or volcanic complex and stick to same in text- I think that would be unnecessarily complex; in most situations even geologists don't draw a distinction. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:26, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
- ..
.produced large ignimbrites such as the La Joya, Arequipa Airport and Yura Tuff ignimbrites; - avoid word repetition where possible- Leaving out the second "ignimbrite" suggests that they are all a "tuff", which would not be correct. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:26, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
- ..
-
but the volcano is considered to be only dormant and due to its closeness to the city of Arequipa is considered a high risk volcano.- avoid word repetition where possible- Removed the second "volcano", but I am not sure if the result is grammatical. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:26, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
- It is grammatical....but might be able to be fine-tuned....not sure....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:15, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
- Removed the second "volcano", but I am not sure if the result is grammatical. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:26, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
-
- ..
.most easily climbed six-thousanders - huh? link?- It's part of a sequence with Category:Mountains by height but apparently we don't have the 6000 form. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:26, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
- In which case it is jargon and should be changed to "mountains over 6000 m. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:14, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
- It's part of a sequence with Category:Mountains by height but apparently we don't have the 6000 form. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:26, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
- ..
If you could expand the Name section - expand on meaning of name, brief folklore, date from when name used, alternative names etc.- Added another item, but I don't think there is much information of this kind. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:26, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
- That's annoying. I was wondering why it is called "brave".....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:14, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
- Perhaps in Aymara/Quechua "brave" and "male" are a common root? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:29, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
- That's annoying. I was wondering why it is called "brave".....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:14, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
- Added another item, but I don't think there is much information of this kind. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:26, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
In para 3 of Geography and geomorphology section, maybe describe the complex and then the highest peak. COmes across as a little contradictory as is- @Casliber:Changed this a bit. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:26, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
- The city of Arequipa with about one million inhabitants and infrastructure such as the airport, hydropower plants and reservoirs are within range of Chachani. - you mean "in range of a (Large? average?) eruption of Chachani. Also this section could do with some more explanation. Is the city directly downhill? are there valleys in between? Evacuation plan?
- Yes, basically. As stated earlier in the article, Arequipa is at the foot of Chachani, but there is no evacuation map presumably because this volcano is not active. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:23, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
and the Geophysical Institute of Peru in 2018 began installing a monitoring station on Chachani- was it installed or only part-installed that year? If the former then "began" is redundant.
1. Well written?:
- Prose quality: (probably some more fine-tuning needed for FA candidacy though, but alright now)
- Manual of Style compliance:
2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
- References to sources:
- Citations to reliable sources, where required:
- No original research:
3. Broad in coverage?:
- Major aspects:
- Focused:
4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
- Fair representation without bias:
5. Reasonably stable?
- No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):
6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
- Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
- Pass or Fail: - Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 20:29, 23 September 2019 (UTC)