Talk:Château de la Motte

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Normandy Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Normandy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Normandy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NormandyWikipedia:WikiProject NormandyTemplate:WikiProject NormandyNormandy
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

File:Pond posterized.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Pond posterized.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:11, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Artistically" photoshopped images

I have removed a number of photographic images which have been run through posterization, oil painting, and other "artistic" bitmap filters. Images on Wikipedia should be descriptive, and not artistic (or at least, if they are artistic, it should not be at the expense of descriptiveness). I think it would be great if the contributor could upload the original, unprocessed versions of these. However, it's not necessary to include all of them in this article, which is rather heavy on images. The article could still do with some more image pruning. Galleries should be uploaded to Commons and then linked to from here.

I also removed the Black Death animation as this doesn't have much to do with the subject of this article. Possibly some other similar images should also be removed. —Psychonaut (talk) 20:03, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

reason for including location

I appreciate the attention to the article, however the change may cause much more confusion in the future. If you do a search on chateau de la motte Wikipedia France you will see dozens with the same name. It is not a family or place name but a description name. A motte is an earth mound fortress built during from the viking age to the 1200's. La Motte may be the most common chateau name in France.I chose the title location to differentuate this one from others that may eventually be included on the the English Wikipedia. I followed what seemed to be the French system by naming it after the commune the chateau sits in. Most La Motte chateaux are more prominent than this one.Mlane (talk) 16:33, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look at Category:Châteaux in France for examples of the names of other chateaus. Disambiguation (which is in effect what you do when you add the location) is only necessary to avoid confusion with other Wikipedia articles. If and when there are articles about other chateaus with the same name, the title issue can be revisited. – ukexpat (talk) 16:40, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This seems to be an issue now with the famous TV show. Strange wikipedia article. It is like not an enclyopedia entry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.159.39.88 (talk) 04:09, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Château de la Motte. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20010522060001/http://www.gouberville.asso.fr/site/quiest.html to http://www.gouberville.asso.fr/site/quiest.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:23, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]