Talk:Ceylon tea

Sources

This page does not reference any sources and makes use of unverifiable content, for example, under leaf grades, 'Silver Tips: The finest buds from teas of a special colour which turn velvety silver when dried. A very delicate fragrant brew of mystical medicinal properties.

Golden Tips: The finest buds of a special clone, which turns velvety Gold due to coating of juices. A very delicate fragrant brew, of mystical medicinal properties.' —Preceding unsigned comment added by Goingwiddershins (talk • contribs) 04:56, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect

ceylon tea redirects to this page. shouldn't it instead redirect to ceylon tea (disambiguation)? Soyseñorsnibbles^Dígame 18:21, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brewing

Can someone add specifics for brewing Ceylon black tea (temperature of water and brewing time)? Badagnani 01:48, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Healthfulness

does somebody know whether or not ceylon tea is more or less healthy in regards to other black tea or any other tea? --—Preceding unsigned comment added by Avr1891 (talk • contribs)

Fair use rationale for Image:Lion logo.jpg

Image:Lion logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 22:10, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Sri Lanka Tea Gardens Nuwara Eliya.jpg

Image:Sri Lanka Tea Gardens Nuwara Eliya.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:02, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Leaf grades

The leaf grades section mentions teas that do not fall under Ceylon tea (black) the title of this article. Sencha for example. OrangeDog (talk • edits) 01:01, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

I'm not sure there's anything to disambiguate here. They are tea, and they are from Ceylon. The black tea article has quite a bit of general purpose information which would apply to any of the three kinds, while the green and white teas are extremely stubby and overly boosterish. Having separate articles seems somewhat like having a disambiguation page for "Florida oranges" with links to three different articles on types of oranges, some of which happen to be grown in Florida. I am going to propose merging of the three. bd2412 T 18:24, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hearing no objection, I am merging these now. bd2412 T 05:39, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Strong oppose - This should have been noted on the individual pages. We at the tea project do have individual articles on each variety of tea, not a single article on tea production in a given nation. This was an ill-considered and hasty move, and should be undone. Badagnani (talk) 06:23, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- First off, as stubby as the articles were, they still managed to be ridiculously spammy and promotional, and as I discovered when I went to effect the merge, everything that was in them that wasn't flat out promotion was already in tea production in Sri Lanka. The references were nonsense. There was literally nothing salvageable that could be moved to the article to which I ended up redirecting the titles. Second, we have articles on black tea, green tea, and white tea, and I saw nothing in these articles distinguishing the Ceylon varieties by anything but unsubstantiated "ours taste the best" type puffery. If you can put together some decent, properly sourced articles, have at it. But there's no point in bringing these back as they were. bd2412 T 07:05, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm a little concerned that this action was taken after zero support from other Wikipedians. --Bxj (talk) 18:02, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Restore proposal

Currently this article, Ceylon tea, redirects to Tea production in Sri Lanka. To me, it seems like "Ceylon tea" should be the main topic, and "Tea production in Sri Lanka" should be the sub-topic that should or shouldn't be spun off into its own separate article. Currently, there is only the production article. Therefore, whenever we want to link to an article about the tea itself, culture surrounding the tea, or anything else, we have to link to the production article because that's the only one that currently exists. It should be the other way around: "Ceylon tea" should be the title of the main topic and article, and depending on the needs, sub-topics could be spun off into their own articles. Or, we could just have it all in one article titled "Ceylon tea." --Bxj (talk) 18:00, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I support restoring this article to "Ceylon tea". Stumbling on the article, I was confused as to why it would be moved to "Tea production in Sri Lanka" in the first place. -Kai445 (talk) 00:47, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... a valid encylopedic subject, sourced by many academic articles. --Chanaka L (talk) 05:45, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]